The Stoat 12:49 Mon Feb 23
Chelsea to appeal Matic's red card
|
|
Bad tackle for sure but you can't go around retaliating like that
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/31583092
If he wins I hope Paolo is watching ;-)
|
|
|
Replies - Newest Posts First ( Show In Chronological Order)
Trevor B
11:34 Wed Feb 25
Re: Chelsea to appeal Matic's red card
|
Barnes played the ball, it was Matic's fault for being too late, hence why nobody else was in uproar until Matic went for Barnes. Zouma and various other Chelsea players were near and didn't react to the 'tackle' at all.
|
Mrkxxx
11:26 Wed Feb 25
Re: Chelsea to appeal Matic's red card
|
Why is a push now a red card and a potential career ending tackle...not a red card?
Why is a penalty now also potentially sending off?
Both as ridiculous as reporting to the Police that you were offended by a group of people singing a song, when you were not there yourself to witness the incident or indeed...be offended.
FUCK OFF..
|
Cony Tottee
10:56 Wed Feb 25
Re: Chelsea to appeal Matic's red card
|
Wasn't Rooney's ban reduced to two matches when he got sent off for England?
|
daveyg
7:40 Tue Feb 24
Re: Chelsea to appeal Matic's red card
|
ornchurch
That's exactly how I saw it.
In real time that's how it was. Pundit's who have played the game got it wrong.
Good article in the Guardian backs Dyche.
I wouldn't mind this man at my club.
Whether he is ready to take a club like ours the next step upwards is up to the two Dave's to work out.
http://www.theguardian.com/football/2015/feb/24/jose-mourinho-sean-dyche-chelsea-burnley-football-ashley-barnes-nemanja-matic#comment-48010687
|
Sven Roeder
7:40 Tue Feb 24
Re: Chelsea to appeal Matic's red card
|
Have heard of 3 match bans being wiped out but has one ever been reduced to 1 or 2 matches before?
He misses our game which is all that REALLY matters
|
ornchurch ammer
7:33 Tue Feb 24
Re: Chelsea to appeal Matic's red card
|
FA in making it up as they go along shocker!!
|
JohnnyL
7:10 Tue Feb 24
Re: Chelsea to appeal Matic's red card
|
How does that work? Surely it is a 3 match ban. Possibly a one match one or even four if the FA thought the appeal was poor but this appears to set a precedent
|
WHU77
6:52 Tue Feb 24
Re: Chelsea to appeal Matic's red card
|
Down to TWO games still misses our game thou ha ha ha !!!
|
Dr Congo
11:16 Tue Feb 24
Re: Chelsea to appeal Matic's red card
|
Am I right thinking that because the ref gave a free kick but didn't book Barnes the FA can't punish him retrospectively because it means the ref did see the foul? Dreadful tackle but it would be a recipe for anarchy if Matic's appeal is upheld, he has to get an extra game for a frivolous appeal. They must be working on some way to stop the hearing taking place this week so he can play in the LC final.
|
ornchurch ammer
11:00 Tue Feb 24
Re: Chelsea to appeal Matic's red card
|
There was no tackle, it was a collision.
Matic went to close him down, was a bit late, and copped Barnes foot on the follow through from making a pass.
|
Rossal
11:00 Tue Feb 24
Re: Chelsea to appeal Matic's red card
|
He has just pushed the bloke who nearly broke his leg......3 game ban seems harsh
Much rather see that then him roll around for 10 minutes like Valencia and Kouyate do alot
With regard to Barnes, he is trying to get the ball but got their late, has gone through Matic and could of been nasty, poorly timed yes....malicious in it with intent to snap his leg no
Stop the knicker wetting and move on
|
Pancho
10:56 Tue Feb 24
Re: Chelsea to appeal Matic's red card
|
Dyche is a fat headed ginger Millwall prick.
You can't excuse that tackle on any level.
|
PDC ON THE VOLLEY
10:51 Tue Feb 24
Re: Chelsea to appeal Matic's red card
|
ornchurch ammer 10:29 Tue Feb 24
Re: Chelsea to appeal Matic's red card
I'm with Sean Dyche on this anyway. Barnes passed the ball and Matic's got there a bit late and ran in to his foot on its follow through.
Sorry but that foul was an absolute scandal. a leg breaker and he should be getting a 3 match ban for it - Matic rightly so gets a 3 game ban for reacting.
|
Pancho
10:50 Tue Feb 24
Re: Chelsea to appeal Matic's red card
|
He should have clumped him. This sudden rush of blood then nothing but a girly shove is pathetic.
Do a Duncan Ferguson and knock the cunt out.
|
ornchurch ammer
10:29 Tue Feb 24
Re: Chelsea to appeal Matic's red card
|
I'm with Sean Dyche on this anyway. Barnes passed the ball and Matic's got there a bit late and ran in to his foot on its follow through.
|
Billy Blagg
10:15 Tue Feb 24
Re: Chelsea to appeal Matic's red card
|
Regardless of the bad tackle I don't see any scenario where getting up and angrily pushing player over can be allowed. Where would it stop otherwise? At least, if video reff'ing was going on then the player committing the foul might have gone. Then it's a question of length of ban. Perhaps one for Matic and for the foul etc.
|
Sniper
11:00 Mon Feb 23
Re: Chelsea to appeal Matic's red card
|
The only thing that should happen is a ban for the tackle. The reaction, though partly justified, is still a red card offence. Otherwise it's almost carte Blanche for a fouled player to do whatever he wants!!!
|
franksfat&slow&wank
9:46 Mon Feb 23
Re: Chelsea to appeal Matic's red card
|
I'd be happy to apply ice hockey rules let them smash a few at each other ... Few mins in a sin bin
|
Hammers1993
4:18 Mon Feb 23
Re: Chelsea to appeal Matic's red card
|
I don't get all this bollocks that if a ref see's it the outcome can't be changed.
Why?
If you make a mistake in work, it would get rectified. You wouldn't just go, oh yeah he saw that it was a mistake so that is that, can't be changed now.
If a ref get's a decision wrong, which he did do, he didn't even give Barnes a yellow for that tackle, it should be reviewed and rectified, i.e 3 game ban.
Matic was within his rights to push him to the ground, that still is a red mind.
|
| 
